Concerned
over Congolese President Joseph Kabila's apparent attempts to cling to power,
U.S. officials are pushing for sanctions against his inner circle but running
into opposition from European powers wary of moving too quickly.
| Joseph Kabila Kabange, President of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, addresses the 69th United Nations General Assembly at the U.N. headquarters in New York September 25, 2014. |
Kabila is ineligible to
stand in Democratic Republic of Congo's next election due in November, after
serving two elected terms. Opponents accuse him of plotting to hold onto power
by delaying the poll or even changing the constitution to remove the term
limit, as several African leaders have done.
His government says it
is unlikely to be able to organize the vote on time, and the electoral
commission has said the delay could last 16 months. Senior Kabila ally Henri
Mova Sakani on Saturday raised the possibility of a constitutional referendum
on the number of terms he can serve.
Any such move risks
triggering further violence in Congo, which has never had a peaceful transition
of power. Donors worry about a repeat of the regional conflict in eastern Congo
between 1996 and 2003, when millions of people died and more than a half-dozen
countries were sucked into the fighting.
"This is an
historic moment because Congo is such an important part of Africa,"
Senator Edward Markey, the Africa subcommittee ranking Democrat, told Reuters.
"They are going to be looked to for leadership or a failure of
leadership."
Protests against a
potential delay have already turned violent and authorities have arrested
dozens of critics of Kabila, who took power when his father was assassinated in
2001.
The resolution last
month by three senior Democrat senators, including Markey, calls on President
Barack Obama to join with international partners "to impose targeted
sanctions on those officials ... who are responsible for violence and human
rights violations and undermining the democratic processes or institutions of
DRC, including visa bans and assets freezes."
CONFLICTING
VIEWS
U.S.
officials, including the State Department's special envoy to Africa's Great
Lakes region, Tom Perriello, and several senators, are considering sanctions
against Congolese officials, for the moment mostly lower-level people in the
security forces.
The
Senate's Africa subcommittee will hold a hearing on June 8 on U.S. sanctions
policy in sub-Saharan Africa. Senator Jeff Flake, the subcommittee's chairman,
told Reuters he had discussed targeted sanctions with State Department
officials.
The
U.S. Congress is pushing President Barack Obama's administration to act unilaterally
if it must.
But
without the EU, sanctions may have little impact since officials in Congo, a
former Belgian colony, are thought to have most assets in Europe. The European
Union is divided on the subject, and even nations that support sanctions want
to exhaust other options first.
"The
assessment ... is that we still have a little bit of time to see what is going
to happen in DRC," one Western diplomat posted to Washington said.
A
European diplomat based in Kinshasa said European thinking is that sanctions
threats would "have the best effect when they serve as a warning, not
having to be implemented".
Within
the EU, Britain is among those leaning toward sanctions with Spain and Italy
more reluctant, diplomats say.
The
Washington-based diplomat suggested that, as is often the case, commercial
interests may play a part in some calculations. A Spanish-led consortium is one
of two finalists to develop a $14 billion segment of the Grand Inga
hydroelectric project, meant to produce 44,000 MW in all.
Spain's
ACS, which is in the consortium, declined to comment. The Spanish Foreign
Ministry said it had no comment.
Other
EU states also question the efficacy of actually going through with sanctions.
The concern is that they "would put him [Kabila] in a corner right now and
actually make him more defiant and probably make it even more complicated to
have ... substantial dialogue," the Washington-based diplomat said.
"SELECTIVE"
"We
hope to coordinate with the Europeans and that they would follow suit
quickly," one U.S. official said.
The
vast wealth contained in Congo's forests and the minerals underneath them has
often divided world powers since its independence in 1960, when the United
States and the former Soviet Union vied for Cold War influence.
Extra
U.N. sanctions beyond current travel bans and asset freezes related to conflict
in eastern Congo would not get past veto-wielding Russia and China, Congo's top
trading partner.
Meanwhile,
the country's African neighbors, who analysts think carry the greatest
influence, have remained silent.
Congo's
government has bristled at talk of sanctions. In a statement last month,
foreign minister Raymond Tshibanda denounced the "selective
application" of sanctions threats, when the presidents of Rwanda and the
smaller neighboring state Congo Republic have already changed their
constitutions to let themselves stand for third terms.
Last
month allies of Moise Katumbi, Kabila's main political rival, visited
Washington to plead for sanctions.
Stephanie
Wolters, a Congo analyst at the Institute for Security Studies in Pretoria,
said U.S. sanctions could send an important message but warned that it was also
a risky strategy.
"The
more isolated the government becomes, the harder it will be to manage potential
fallouts of the growing crisis," she said. "European countries are
worried about just that."
Reuters
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário